As I was preparing to write about the new diagnostic criteria proposed regarding the identification of autistic spectrum disorders, a front page New York Times article created a stir about them. The authors of an as yet unpublished study looked at children who had been diagnosed with milder impairments such as Asperger Syndrome and found that a high percentage may no longer be diagnosed under the newly proposed system. The researchers involved in the DSM-5 changes disagree, and have their own data showing that the new criteria include higher functioning children and adults. While I am hopeful the authors of the revision will continue to keep in mind the need to identify higher functioning individuals with autism, I believe simplification of the autism diagnosis is going to help families and children get the care that they require.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (1)
Condensing the terminology around autism into one diagnosis should therefore clarify the needs of individual children. Instead of focusing energy on which of the three ‘labels' is most accurate
Still sounds to me like they are looking for a way to cut funding to certain areas (education), while at the same time continue to get their own funding (mental health).
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.



